Smartphones are great devices but – no matter how much manufacturers say otherwise – their smallish screens aren’t ideal for prolonged web browsing of the sort many people do when reading news.
So of course it makes sense to develop apps where they can make the maximum use of the device’s screen and any native software capabilities and here in the UK The Guardian, Telegraph and Sky have built some excellent apps.
This week the BBC were also allowed to make their news apps available but, to much annoyance, there’s currently no Android app – just an iPad/iPhone/iPod app and some Blackberry ‘launcher apps’.
Now, I’m no longer an Android user but I sympathise with the frustration of those Licence Fee payers who are and can’t yet download apps for their smartphones because the BBC has prioritised Apple’s mobile devices.
Of course, in the desktop market the BBC does this to Mac users who were initially locked out of the iPlayer and even this year were only able to download the Doctor Who computer games after PC users had already done so.
I don’t see how it’s acceptable for the BBC to prioritise one brand of mobile or one OS over another – they wouldn’t be allowed to do likewise with a broadcast service – not least because it risks giving one platform a commercial advantage over rivals.
What, I think, makes things worse is that time has been spend on making the BBC news app work on the iPad yet that device – which I’m a massive fan of – has a large screen and a browser capable of displaying pretty much all of the BBC’s standard website.
That is, except the Flash video the corporation insists on using on the news site.
The only rationale for the iPad app seems to be the inclusion of non-Flash video, and yet the BBC happily serves up the iPayer on iDevices using a different video format, something it could easily also do with embedded footage in bbc.co.uk.
This is another point of contention for Android users who are apparently going to miss out unless they have the latest, Flash-enabled version of the OS.
Whatever platform you use, the BBC’s continued favouring and prioritising of one over another isn’t right, in future apps should be developed and released at the same time for the widest range of platforms.
I completely agree with this post. The latest figures show that Android OS is growing at a faster pace than IPhone. Android is an open source and multi-platform OS so it should be prioritize over the secretive and single-platform IPhone OS.
I’m not sure any OS should be prioritised, the BBC’s services arepaid for by all of us. By supporting one OS before or over another the BBC is effectively creating a category of ‘approved’ devices for which they’ll tailor their services, locking out some brands and platforms.
That’s not what I pay my Licence Fee for, even if it happens that ‘my’ platform is the one currently in favour withthebeeb.
I also agree with the post. Android and open source systems are the future, and this alone should be enough reason to give them, if not a priority, at least equal status with the other OS. Perhaps it could have some link to placement fee’s etc. I notice that Apple seems to be the preferred laptop in the news studio’s, although it is difficult to pose a convincing argument as to why they should be considered any better than a PC in this situation.
Nokia still has by far the biggest smartphone install base. How frustrating it must be that this whole user population is largely ignored by app developers.
Bbc should concentrate on its mobile website, accessible to all JavaScript enabled phones.